Terraqua - Land Investment

The Land Investor

News and Commentary on Land-based Investment

Fewer Cows, More Money

The progressive land investor is always looking for ways to tweak and optimize land management practices.  This is an interesting account of a Texas rancher who has reinvented the way he operates.  Lower stocking rates combined with modifications in land use practices; particularly reducing energy intensive inputs, boosted his returns.

Fewer Cows, More Money

Mon Jul 4, 2011 09:38 AM CDT

By Del Deterling
Contributing Editor.  DTN/The Progressive Farmer.
Five years ago, Texas cattle producer Jim Theeck revised his herd management plan, cutting costs by $150 per cow in the process. After nearly 35 years of intensive ranch management, Jim Theeck realized a few years back he either had to go cheaper or get out of the business.

“Cow production inputs started to skyrocket,” explains Theeck, the veteran central Texas cowman. “That’s when I realized to survive in the cattle business I had to learn to do it with one cow to 10 acres with very little supplement or hay, as opposed to one cow to 2 to 3 acres as I was doing before.”

Beginning five years ago, Theeck, who runs 500 cows on 5,300 acres near Brenham, Tex., stopped fertilizing grass, cut back on spraying weeds and reduced hay and supplemental feeding to the bare minimum. Sounds like the recipe for disaster?

Well, in the past few years, he’s weaned a 92% calf crop on all cows. For one herd he’s fed three round bales of hay in three years. And, in 2006, he weaned the heaviest calf crop ever off this herd—719 pounds without creep feed.

Jason Cleere, Texas A&M Extension beef cattle specialist, says reducing stocking rates may be a rancher’s best solution to rising input costs.

He says it makes sense for cattlemen to step back and analyze their operations to see if they can do better with less. “We’re not suggesting cutbacks that reduce cow performance or reduce calf quality,” Cleere assures. “You don’t want to cut back on nutrition, animal health or genetic improvement.

“But what you can do is reduce fertilizer rates and stocking rates. Depending on which rainfall region you are in, if you’ve been running one cow to 3 or 4 acres, consider running one cow to 6 or 8 acres,” Cleere continues.

The biggest savings, he adds, can come from relying less on hay feeding and making more use of standing hay crops or stockpiled forages.

“Stocking at less than 100% capacity actually can provide more flexibility,” Cleere explains. “In a good forage year, you have the option to bale and sell excess forage, retain ownership of your calves, purchase stockers or lease out pastures for custom grazing.”

Economics first.

In times like these, “economics trumps tradition.” Theeck can speak to that. As general manager of the Mayfair Ranch at Brenham for 28 years before striking out on his own a dozen years ago, Theeck was on the cutting edge of beef production technology.

“I was always maximizing everything,” he recalls. “Maximum fertilizer, maximum weaning weights, maximum yearling weights.

“I can’t do maximum anymore,” he maintains. “I’ve determined that weaning a 650-pound calf is about the best I can do under our environment. I can push that up to 700 or 750 pounds, but the inputs cost more than I can get back in returns. I have to work on production costs.”

So far, Theeck has observed few drawbacks to his cutbacks. “This ranch had a lot of Coastal bermudagrass. Since I’ve quit fertilizing, I’ve seen some increase in native forages—buffalo grass, vine mesquite, big and little bluestem and Indiangrass. But they provide pretty good grazing as well. I’ve also had some bur clover come back,” he reports.

“But after 28 years of heavy nitrogen fertilization, the Coastal is holding up pretty well.”

Theeck typically harvests about 200 round bales of hay a year for emergencies and to feed to weaning calves. He has it custom baled to cut down on machinery investment. He owns several older-model tractors with front-end loaders and two that he uses for shredding and planting oat pastures. His labor crew consists only of one man who has been with him for 35 years.

Theeck limits supplemental feeding to a high-energy cube when cows are on dry standing grass and a 10% protein cube when he has to feed hay. When stockpiled forage isn’t available, he purchases hay with a minimum protein percentage of 9%.

“I have a closed herd so I don’t vaccinate my cows,” he says. “But I do vaccinate all my calves. Calves are all preconditioned for 45 to 60 days. I’ve been selling all my steers and non-replacement heifers at the Commingled Preconditioned Calf Sale at San Saba. That’s added about $100 per head in net profit.”

Theeck has noticed a slight reduction in cow conception rates. “Back when I started, I had a 95% conception rate. Last year it was down to 92%,” he concedes. “But my savings from fertilizer, feed and fuel more than make up for the loss of three calves per 100 cows.”

http://www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com/dtnag/common/link.do;jsessionid=75F2BCCE0AC9BD9C4D0950D48277FC0A.agfreejvm1?symbolicName=/free/livestock/news/template1&product=/ag/news/livestock/features&vendorReference=0702DDBA&paneContentId=3030&paneParentId=0

This entry was posted in Agriculture, Ranches, Ranching. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*

  • Recent Articles

  • Browse Articles by Category

  • Article Archives

  • Subscribe to our mailing list.

  • Contact Terraqua

    1625 Larimer St., Suite 506
    Denver, Colorado 80202
    303-900-4226
    watsonj@terraqua.us